Analysis of business results & financial statements · Quý 1/2026
● Maintaining
Trailing net profit reached 72.4bn, fell 18.4bn compared with the same period last year. Key positives came from higher gross profit and lower tax. Offsetting pressure came mainly from higher selling expenses and higher administrative expenses. Detailed impact is shown below:
See what is changing ↓- P/E
- 9.34x
- P/B
- 1.06x
- EPS
- 2,062
- BVPS
- 18,209
- ROE
- 11.4%
- ROA
- 5.2%
- Market price
- 19,250 20 Oct 2026
The current picture
What Is Changing
On a TTM 2026Q1 basis, CNG posted slightly higher revenue but margins narrowed — the two forces offset each other, leaving the overall picture largely unchanged — the growth momentum has held across consecutive periods. What remains unclear is which side will dominate in coming periods.
Profit bridge
Vs last year · TTM
- Gross profit
- Tax
- Selling expenses
- Administrative expenses
Across periods
A single data point, or a trajectory?
Latest eight quarters · Quý 1/2026
| Metric | Q1'26 | Q4'25 | Q3'25 | Q2'25 | Q1'25 | Q4'24 | Q3'24 | Q2'24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,191.7 | 1,570.0 | 1,166.0 | 1,095.1 | 850.3 | 1,056.3 | 988.7 | 840.4 |
| LNST | 4.4 | 4.6 | 26.2 | 37.2 | 1.3 | 17.5 | 27.4 | 44.6 |
| Net margin | 0.37% | 0.29% | 2.25% | 3.39% | 0.16% | 1.65% | 2.77% | 5.31% |
Revenue
1,192bnNet income
4bnNet margin
0.37%Inside the statements
A closer look at what is happening inside the business
A company's statements are read with the questions that fit its type of business.
Is the profit sustainable?
Margins narrowed but earnings quality remains clean — pressure is mainly operational.
What is driving the margin?
▼Net margin narrowed to 1.44%, falling 1.0pp. The main pressure comes from SG&A / Revenue rose 1.1pp and Gross margin fell 0.1pp (in addition, Other profit / Revenue rose 0.0pp added support while Net financial result / Revenue fell 0.0pp remained a drag).
The pressure comes from core operations — this is a concerning type of decline, not a one-off movement.
- Net Margin
- 1.44% −1.0pp
- Gross Margin
- 8.04% −0.1pp
- SG&A / Revenue
- 6.22% +1.1pp
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Is capital being used efficiently?
Capital efficiency for utilities should be read alongside regulated tariffs and long-cycle depreciation — ROIC of 15.2% reflects a large fixed-asset base.
Is capital being deployed efficiently?
▼ROIC fell to 15.20%, losing 6.7pp. That translates to 15.20 in after-tax operating profit for every 100 units of operating capital. The main pressure came from NOPAT margin narrowed 1.0pp, outweighing the movement in capital turnover; while invested capital rose by 54bn.
For utilities, ROIC reflects returns on a large fixed-asset base — this is a reference signal and should be read alongside regulated tariffs.
Balance Sheet
▼ROIC for utilities reflects a large fixed-asset base and regulated tariffs — the balance sheet below adds perspective. Balance sheet is exceptionally sound — liabilities at 1.70x equity, with a net cash position equivalent to 0.14x equity.
None
Over the last 12 months, working capital absorbed 23.9bn of cash, mainly because of higher receivables and higher inventories. Part of that drag was offset by higher payables.
Working Capital Efficiency
▼Cash conversion cycle lengthened by 3.1 days versus the same period last year. The main moves came from DIO fell 2.1 days, DSO rose 0.0 days, and DPO fell 5.2 days.
Working capital cycle lengthened mainly due to shorter payment timing — may reflect pressure from suppliers.
For utilities, working capital cycle reflects regulated pricing mechanics and long-term settlement contracts — DSO/DIO/DPO should be treated as contextual signals rather than pure efficiency indicators.
CCC is up by +3.1 days, indicating weaker working-capital turnover versus the prior year.
DSO increased by +0.0 days, pointing to slower receivables turnover.
DuPont
What drives ROE?
ROE fell from 14.7% to 11.4% — net margin weakened the most, though asset turnover and leverage still provided support.
Is financial risk significant?
Financial risk is low — the company has net cash and CFO reached 53.7bn.
Leverage & Liquidity
▲Leverage looks fairly comfortable, with net debt / equity at −0.14x and interest coverage at 17.00x.
At present, short-term debt accounts for 24.0% of total debt, cash equals 223.9% of debt, and total debt stands at 74.6bn.
Leverage for utilities reflects long-term capital needs for fixed assets and recovery through regulated pricing — elevated leverage is structural to the industry.
- Net Debt / Equity
- −0.14x +0.24x
- Interest Coverage
- 17.00x −11.26x
- Cash / Debt
- 223.9% −229.9pp
- Short-term Debt / Total Debt
- 24.0% −23.1pp
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Cash Flow
▼With safe leverage noted above, cash flow below shows the self-funding capacity. Operating cash flow reached 53.7bn in 2025, against investing cash flow of -132.1bn.
Post-investment cash flow was negative +78.4bn. Financing cash flow was negative +25.0bn.
CFO / net income was 0,76 lần.
After spending +164.5bn on fixed-asset investment, the business generated trailing free cash flow of −109.6bn.
For utilities, high capex and long investment cycles are structural — short-term FCF volatility does not reflect long-term cash generation through regulated pricing.
In summary
Research synthesis
What this reporting period is showing
The business is balanced but not yet fully stable — some components are moving the right way while others still need monitoring. This is a state to keep watching, with not enough signal to tilt the thesis either way. The brighter spot is earnings conversion is confirmed, with CFO/NI at 0.76x. The next item to monitor is capital efficiency, with ROIC at 15.2%.
- Improvement: earnings conversion looks more confirmed, with CFO / net income at 0.76x.
- Watchpoint: Capital efficiency needs cycle context.
What to verify next
Questions for the next period
Durability of revenue growth after the current +34,5% YoY pace.
Ability to hold margins around the current 1.44% level.
Cash-flow quality, with operating cash flow currently at 53.7bn in 2025.
From one stock to the whole portfolio
Where does this stock stand
among the rest of your investments?
Each stock is only one part of the wider picture. Looking at investments side by side makes their contribution, risks and opportunities across the portfolio clearer.
How much does this stock
contribute to the portfolio?
Its weight and influence across the assets held for investment.
Is the portfolio
well balanced?
How holdings, sectors and asset groups are distributed in relation to overall risk.
What other opportunities
or risks may be present?
What becomes visible only when investments are viewed together rather than one ticker at a time.